Dr. Keerthi Katam

Environmental Engineering - Assistant Professor

Impact of Yeast Strain Selection on Ethanol Yield from Low Concentration KMnO4 Pretreated Rice Straw: Process Design and Utility Cost Analysis


Journal article


S. Amornraksa, M. Sriariyanun, A. Tawai, P. Tantayotai, Sunphong Thanok, Theerawut Phusantsumpan, P. Show, Keerthi Katam
Applied Science and Engineering Progress, 2025

Semantic Scholar DOI
Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
Amornraksa, S., Sriariyanun, M., Tawai, A., Tantayotai, P., Thanok, S., Phusantsumpan, T., … Katam, K. (2025). Impact of Yeast Strain Selection on Ethanol Yield from Low Concentration KMnO4 Pretreated Rice Straw: Process Design and Utility Cost Analysis. Applied Science and Engineering Progress.


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Amornraksa, S., M. Sriariyanun, A. Tawai, P. Tantayotai, Sunphong Thanok, Theerawut Phusantsumpan, P. Show, and Keerthi Katam. “Impact of Yeast Strain Selection on Ethanol Yield from Low Concentration KMnO4 Pretreated Rice Straw: Process Design and Utility Cost Analysis.” Applied Science and Engineering Progress (2025).


MLA   Click to copy
Amornraksa, S., et al. “Impact of Yeast Strain Selection on Ethanol Yield from Low Concentration KMnO4 Pretreated Rice Straw: Process Design and Utility Cost Analysis.” Applied Science and Engineering Progress, 2025.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@article{s2025a,
  title = {Impact of Yeast Strain Selection on Ethanol Yield from Low Concentration KMnO4 Pretreated Rice Straw: Process Design and Utility Cost Analysis},
  year = {2025},
  journal = {Applied Science and Engineering Progress},
  author = {Amornraksa, S. and Sriariyanun, M. and Tawai, A. and Tantayotai, P. and Thanok, Sunphong and Phusantsumpan, Theerawut and Show, P. and Katam, Keerthi}
}

Abstract

This study evaluates the impact of yeast strain selection on ethanol yield from KMnO₄-pretreated rice straw, integrating process design and utility cost analysis. KMnO₄—a cost-effective, widely available, and less toxic alternative to acid pretreatments—is applied at a 1.36% concentration. Fermentation of a 49 mg/mL sugar solution using four yeast strains identified Pichia kudriavzevii TISTR 5147 (PK 5147) as the most efficient, achieving a 93.59% ethanol conversion—significantly outperforming Saccharomyces cerevisiae (20.95%), Kluyveromyces marxianus TISTR 5116 (5.96%), and K. marxianus TISTR 5616 (7.51%). Aspen Plus® simulations reveal that although PK 5147 requires 20–24% more distillation energy, its utility cost per ton of ethanol is substantially lower—22 times lower than TISTR 5116 and 13 times less than S. cerevisiae. Higher ethanol concentrations reduced purification energy, and solvent recycling further optimized process costs. Additional savings are achieved through the integration of high-temperature solvent and water recycling within the process design. The wide range of ethanol yields observed (5.96–93.59%) highlights the critical role of software-based cost estimation in evaluating experimental results during early-stage process design.